Blog 1, section 6: Mark Robert Rank's, "Why American Poverty Affects Us All" part 1 Entry 2

I agree with Robert Rank's use of applying the multiplier of 3 to create a real sense of the official poverty line for a family or an individual. However, when inflation is not accounted for and the difference in the cost of living within each state is ignored, the multiplier of 3 quickly becomes ineffective. For instance, Washington has the second highest cost for housing in the nation and the multiplier of 3 within Washington will have to account for increased taxes, higher rent and utilities, and raised food prices. If inflation is indeed accounted for, Rank’s multiplier of 3 may be an efficient approach in eliminating the existence of poverty. This method controls spending out of incomes and creates responsibility and management for a family and an individual’s well being. In my opinion, measuring the poverty rate within this process is necessary because not being able to provide your family with a healthy and safe environment should be considered below the poverty rate because assistance is needed.